T38   A Very Incomplete Review of Literature

• all authors agree on how to transform the volume
  sdd
• all authors (except Popovic 2008 ...) agree on how to transform pressure
  sdsd
• we agree with Einstein, Planck and Landsberg on how to transform quantities of heat, while Eddington, Blanusa and Ott write the root factor in the denominator
  saddsa
• for none of these renowned authors the temperature is invariant. It cannot be, since they all assume that k jand hence the entropy S jare invariant
  sdff
• for Einstein and Planck, the temperature decreases by the root factor with increasing relativistic velocities while with Eddington, Ott and some others it correspondingly increases
  sdfsd
• in 1969 van Kampen stated that the measurement of a temperature of a fast-moving object is not possible, and, therefore, temperatures cannot be sensibly transformed within the STR
  saad
• Landsberg claimed in 1970, that temperature and entropy are invariant. Avramov said in 2003 that this was the first attempt to set temperature as an invariant value
  sddf
• in 1996 Landsberg and Matsas claim that in the STR no consistent transformation can be specified for the temperature
  sds
• Avramov in 2003 makes a good case for the claim that the temperature is invariant, and he correctly concludes that jk jand the entropy S jmust transform
  sddas
• in 2006 Khaleghy and Qassemi again argued that temperatures would increase with increasing relativistic velocity
  sdd
• in 2007 Cubero and Hänggi do a computer simulation of a one-dimensional (!) gas and come to the conclusion that temperature can be considered to be an invariant value
  asd
• Popovic touted in 2008 that   P' j=j P · √  ( along with  T' j= T nand  S' j= S )
  asas
• in 2008 Requard attacks with the entire arsenal of tensor calculus. He assumes without reflection that 
  S' j= S jand ends with the results of Eddington and Ott
  sads
• Gérard P. Michon, on his website (2000 - 2013) also assumes  S' j= S jand, logically correct, comes to the same results as Einstein and Planck ('von Mosengeil's formula').
  asd
• finally in 2013 a unknown physics teacher writes this review article, attempting thereby to help the concept of Avramov and Cubero/Hänggi to a breakthrough ...
  sdd
• at least a dozen other publications have thrown no new light on the situation

Conditions and Limitations Diagrams